Incitement to violence / Hate
HC seeks affidavit from state on steps it takes against hate speech
Swati Deshpande / TNN / Updated: Feb 11, 2024 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/hc-seeks-affidavit-from-state-on-steps-it-takes-against-hate-speech/articleshow/107592900.cms
One Shakir Tamboli had filed a plea seeking that the HC direct state govt "to take immediate action" on two FIRs and "prosecute and arrest Pawaskar, and if required transfer the probe to a court-monitored special investigation team".
On Friday, senior counsel Mihir Desai and advocate Lara Jesani, for Tamboli, submitted that police had taken no immediate steps to arrest Pawaskar despite two incidents of alleged hate speeches by him in Sangli's Vita and Islampur too.
Bombay HC has questioned state government on the adequacy of action taken on a plea seeking the arrest of BJP leader Vikram Pawaskar for his alleged role in an attack on a mosque in Satara last September. On Friday, senior counsel Mihir Desai and advocate Lara Jesani, for Shakir Tamboli, had submitted before the court that Pawaskar was also involved in two incidents of hate speeches on Jan 24 and June 2 last year in Sangli district, but no immediate steps had been taken to arrest him.
Police had done videography and registered an FIR. Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, for Pawaskar, sought to intervene, saying the plea was making demands that affect his client’s rights and that he was not made a party to the petition.
Since no written application for intervention was made, the HC did not consider the plea at this stage. The court asked the state several questions on its inaction regarding the two FIRs in Sangli. The government, through public prosecutor Hiten Venegaonkar, submitted one affidavit regarding the Satara case and sought time to file another on the Sangli cases and said police were following the necessary process in taking action.
The court will hear the matter next on March 5. Jesani had submitted last month too that the case on the Jan 24 incident was registered only on May 11, 2023, after several representations were made to police. She argued that police flouted guidelines mentioned in a Jan 13, 2023, Supreme Court order on steps to be taken in cases of hate speech.
In the Jan 19 order, the HC recorded Jesani’s submission which, on Aug 21, 2023, said, “One mosque was vandalised and people were lynched and one person died” and several others were injured. “According to the counsel for the petitioner, one Vikram Pawaskar had incited/ instigated Sangram Mane and others to vandalise the mosque and to fuel communal violence.
She submits that the police have arrested only Sangram Mane, in whose house the alleged conspiracy took place. However, they have not taken any steps vis–a–vis Pawaskar,” the HC order read. On Jan 19, Venegaonkar had stated before the HC that he would “speak to the superior authorities, and if required, appropriate steps would be taken to protect such persons including the petitioner.”
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP from South Delhi, Ramesh Bidhuri, called a fellow MP, Danish Ali, ‘pimp’, ‘terrorist’, ‘militant’ and also us ed the words mullah and katwa – a pejorative word for a Muslim who is circumcised. The abuse was hurled across the floor of parliament. Bidhuri also demanded that Ali be thrown out of parliament. Sitting next to Bidhuri were two senior BJP leaders, Harsh Vardhan, former minister of health and also science and technology, and Ravi Shankar Prasad, former minister of law and justice and communications and information technology. Both of these senior members of the BJP were laughing throughout Bidhuri’s rant. Subsequently, the speaker of parliament, Om Prakash Birla, warned Bidhuri that such behaviour would lead to penalties in the future and he also expunged the abusive comments. The BJP has issued a show cause notice to Bidhuri but it remains to be seen if any action will be taken.
23/09/2023
@ZuberMedia Hadapsar, 10 sep 2023 https://twitter.com/zubermedia/status/1701620141694558618?s=12&t=Esqni9aaHAq3vKp_y4THgw
video: https://twitter.com/i/status/1701620141694558618 सकल हिंदू समाज ने एक और नफरती रैली का आयोजन किया पुणे(महाराष्ट्र) में, जहां भाजपा के पूर्व विधायक और ओबीसी सेल के अध्यक्ष @iYogeshTilekar (मा आमदार, हडपसर विधानसभा । युवा मोर्चा अध्यक्ष, भाजपा, महाराष्ट्र प्रदेश (२०१५-२०२०)। ओबीसी मोर्चा अध्यक्ष, भाजपा, महाराष्ट्र प्रदेश (२०२०-२०२३)) ने मुसलमानों के खिलाफ साजिश पेश करते हुए #नफरत भरा भाषण दिया। Love jihad, Conversions,
It is time for the executive arm of the government as well as the political governance structures to display sagacity and shout out that enough is enough and put a stop to recurring incidents of hate speech.
https://thewire.in/rights/india-hate-speech-violence
An abridged version of Justice Madan B. Lokur and Shruti Narayan’s chapter in the anthology Religion, Hateful Expression and Violence is published here with the permission of the Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher (TOAEP).
The Supreme Court’s most recent judgment considering the issue of hate speech is Amish Devgan v. Union of India (‘Amish Devgan’). Devgan, a television journalist, faced criminal charges under various provisions of the IPC. The charges were filed after he referred to a saint in Islám as an “invader, terrorist and robber who had come to India to convert its population to Islam”, during a TV programme hosted by him. The Court refused to quash the criminal cases, which is an affirmation of the adequacy of existing criminal law to recognize hate speech, even if made accidentally or in error, as was claimed by Devgan. In its rather lengthy judgment, the Court embarked on a comprehensive review of Indian and foreign decisions on hate speech while referring to some helpful academic articles.
The judiciary too should be alive to the consequence of hate speech not being punished suitably and in time. It is often said that ‘delay defeats justice’. But what is more problematic with delay in punishing hate speech is not that justice is denied, but that freedoms in a free society get compromised or corroded to the detriment of targeted individuals, groups or communities. The Supreme Court appears to have taken notice of the urgency of policing hate speech. In a petition seeking redress against the proliferation of hate speech, the Court in October 2022 directed three state police forces to take immediate action to register cases against any incidents of hate speech in their jurisdictions, “even if no complaint is forthcoming”. The Court extended its order to all states in April 2023. It remains to be seen, however, whether state authorities use this order to prosecute genuine cases of hate speech.
Madan B. Lokur and Shruti Narayan
02/09/2023
Nearly 20 current and former faculty members of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIM-B) have asked Indian corporates to defund “the spread of misinformation and hate speech through news channels and social media”, warning that “rapidly increasing levels of radicalization” are “fermenting an atmosphere conducive to large-scale violence “.
https://thewire.in/rights/defund-misinformation-hate-speech-iim-b-faculty-members-india-inc
In a letter written in their personal capacity, the faculty members said they wanted to draw Corporate India’s attention to the “fragile state of internal security with an increasing risk of violent conflicts in the country”. They said that over the past few years, “an open and public exhibit of hatred towards minorities in public discourse has become common practice” in political discourse, television news and social media
09/08/2023
- UNITED NATIONS STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION ON HATE SPEECH
- Despite the SC Order, Hateful Rallies In Maharashtra Persist, Citizens Group Demands Action
- Politics Over Hate Speech Ban in Karnataka
- Chhattisgarh: BJP, VHP members pledge economic boycott of Muslims, Christians after communal clashes
- 'When Politics and Religion Are Segregated, This'll Stop': 8 Quotes From SC's Words on Hate Speech
- T Raja Singh again gave hate speech against Muslims
- How ‘love jihad’ rallies are spreading hate against Muslims in Maharashtra
- Women in Bengaluru protest Pramod Mutalik’s hate speech against Muslim women
- SC on Hate Crimes: 'Primary Duty of State Is to Protect Citizens, No Compromise at All'
- Self-Regulatory Body Issues Guidelines Against Hate Speech for Electronic, Digital Media
- Fake News How Mohamed Aneesh or Dhohane Anesh Raj?
- What Lies Behind Mohan Bhagwat’s Justification of Hate Speech and Violence?
- Supreme Court On Hate Speeches
- How the Supreme Court Has Interpreted Hate Speech Over the Years
- How the Supreme Court Has Interpreted Hate Speech Over the Years
- Backstory: Breaking Hate – When Intent and Content Get Inextricably Entwined
- The Impact of the German NetzdG law on Hate Speech
- "Hate peddling is state-sponsored" Guidelines ?
- Govt a ‘mute witness’ to hate speech problem
- Systematic incitement plan in Maharashtra
- Hate Speech views of Law Commission & Election Commission
- Revati Laul: The Other of Hate
- The rise of hate speech in India
- There is no place for laws on Blasphemy & Apostasy in a Secular Liberal Democracy!
- Why tackle hate speech?
- पैगंबर विवाद पर UN का भी आया बयान, जानिए क्या कहा ?
- "Government Should Say Enough Is Enough"
- The Time is Long Overdue: Hindus Against Hate
- Hate speech is violent in itself
- Hindu Mahapanchayat at Burari Ground
- Hate speech case: If said with smile, no criminality
- Ex-Armed Forces Chiefs Write To President, PM On Haridwar Hate Speeches
- What happened in Amravati shows a spontaneous reaction from Hindus
- Gujarat: Mob Chants Anti-Muslim Slogans, Opposes Hotel's Inauguration
- Prakash Jha Is India's Latest Filmmaker to Hurt Fragile Religious Sentiments
- We will resort to violence, if need be to protect Hindu Dharma
- Yogi Adityanath's provocative statements
- नमाज पढ़ रहे लोगों के सामने भीड़ ने लगाए 'Jai Shri Ram' के नारे
- Fight Hate with CJP
- Abdul Rehman inciting violence in Seelampur
- A Sant Who Threatens Suicide if Muslims, Christians Aren't Stripped of Citizenship
- Manohar Lal Khattar made controversial remarks that encouraged violence
- Maharashtra Clashes : Police Complaint Against Jignesh Mevani, Umar Khalid For Inciting Violence
- Anti-CAA protest
- BJP Alleges Umar Khalid Of Inciting Violence
- BJP Leader Kapil Mishra
- warning agitating farmers that he would discipline them in "two minutes"
- APPROACHES TO COUNTER ONLINE HATE
- Kamlesh Tiwari row Malda 3 Jan 2016
- Begalurut Mob violence.