Delhi HC orders FIR against Rana Ayyub for anti-Hindu remarks • SC declines Udhayanidhi petition https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5gvGcs4XV0 PGurus The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a case against Udhayanidhi Stalin for his anti-Sanatani remarks... what does this mean?
Delhi Court orders FIR registration against journalist Rana Ayyub on allegations of "insulting Hindu deities, spreading of anti-India sentiment and incitement of religious disharmony."
There is also an Enforcement Directorate case against her pending for misappropriation of funds collected during COVID times.
FIR against Rana Ayyub for allegedly referring Hindu students as 'terrorist' https://newsable.asianetnews.com/india/fir-against-rana-ayyub-for-allegedly-referring-hindu-students-as-terrorist-dnm-r88b1a Based on the complaint from Hindu group 'Hindu IT Cell' an FIR was filed against controversial writer Rana Ayyub at Hubballi-Dharwad police commissioner limits reportedly. The complainant Ashwath representing the group had filed the complaint and urged the police to book her under IPC sections 124A (Sedition), 504 (intentional insult to Hindu community), 295A, 298 (deliberate and malicious attempt to outrage religious feelings) and 153A (creating enmity and division).
"She illegally collected Rs 2.69 Crores": ED Moves prosecution complaint against Rana Ayyub under PMLA in Ketto Campaign case https://lawbeat.in/amp/news-updates/she-illegally-collected-rs-269-crores-ed-moves-prosecution-complaint-against-rana-ayyub-ketto-campaign-case ED's investigation has revealed that the funds raised on the online platforms were received in the accounts of Ayyub's father and sister and subsequently transferred to her personal accounts.
Additionally, Ayyub utilized these funds to create a fixed deposit of Rs. 50 lakhs for herself and also transferred Rs. 50 Lakhs in a new bank account, ED has submitted. "Whereas, it was also revealed that only an amount of approximately Rs. 29 lakhs was used for relief work",
https://x.com/LawBeatInd/status/1884072380362084416
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea seeking action Against Udhayanidhi Stalin Over 'Sanatana Dharma' Remarks https://lawbeat.in/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-entertain-plea-seeking-action-against-udhayanidhi-stalin-over Vineet Jindal v Union of India
Hate Speech] Udhaynidhi Stalin's remarks intentionally made to promote enmity: Plea in SC seeks registration of FIR https://lawbeat.in/top-stories/hate-speech-udhaynidhi-stalins-remarks-intentionally-made-promote-enmity-plea-sc-seeks-registration-fir