L50 - Culture in India
Last week at a book launch, Union Home Minister Amit Shah made that clear. Shah said that those who speak English in India would “soon feel ashamed” and that the creation of such a society was not far away. He went on to say that Indian languages are the jewels of our culture, and without them, “we cease to be truly Indian”.
https://theprint.in/opinion/bjp-english-khan-market-gang/2668305/
Shah’s pronouncements aren’t emerging in a vacuum. For years, language debates have simmered in India, particularly around the New Education Policy’s three-language formula, which southern states view as Hindi imposition (although the policy does not explicitly mandate Hindi). Tamil Nadu has been especially vocal in its resistance, labelling the policy as a direct assault on linguistic federalism. The timing of Shah’s remarks – delivered just as Bihar prepares for October-November polls and Tamil Nadu gears up for elections next April – is carefully calibrated electoral ammo. By villainising English, the BJP is no doubt betting that linguistic nationalism will energise its base in the Hindi heartland, even if it alienates the southern states.
So when Shah promises that English speakers will feel ashamed, it begs the question: How exactly does India plan to become the “vishwaguru” if its citizens are ever more insular? Phantom enemies are fine; every government needs a few. But when you convince people that their limitations should be viewed as patriotic victories, the consequences extend far beyond politics. This is how a country talks itself into irrelevance.
The Union home minister’s controversial statement carries deep political and global implications, touching on issues of national identity, linguistic divisions, social mobility, intellectualism and India’s international image.
Non-Hindi speaking states, especially those in the South, East and the Northeast, are likely to see Shah’s statement as yet another attempt by the Hindutva regime to impose a narrow, Hindi-centric identity on the entire country, further deepening regional divides and resentment.
Shah’s statement is not just divisive; it is dangerous. It threatens social mobility, sows linguistic discord, risks India’s global standing, fosters anti-intellectualism and distracts from the real challenges facing the country.
20/06/2025
Subcategories
Language
debate on language, Number of languages being taught in school