BK16
Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail To Sudha Bharadwaj In Bhima Koregaon Case; Refuses Bail To 8 Other Accused By - Sharmeen Hakim 2021-12-01 https://www.livelaw.in/amp/top-stories/bombay-high-court-grants-default-bail-to-sudha-bharadwaj-in-bhima-koregaon-case-refuses-bail-to-8-other-accused-186679 The High Court accepted the petitioners' argument that the Additional Sessions Court, Pune, which took cognizance of the chargesheet filed by the NIA and also extended the period of detention of accused beyond 90 days as per Section 43D(2) of the UAPA, was not competent to do so. Because, the Pune Sessions Court was not notified as a Special Court under the NIA Act. Also, there was another Special NIA Court in existence in Pune at the relevant time... However, the High Court added that this irregularity will not result in vitiation of the cognizance taken on the chargesheet.
"...so far as the applicant Nos.1 to 5 in Application No.1458 of 2019, the aspect of legality or otherwise of the extension of period of detention is of no relevance as the applicants did not avail of the said right to be released on default bail before the charge-sheet was fled against them on 15th November 2018. In the case of applicant Nos. 6 to 8, though wehave held that the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on the report (Exh.33) on 26th November 2018 was without jurisdiction, yet the said declaration is of no assistance to the applicant Nos.6 to 8 as they did not avail of the right to be released on default bail by fling an application, after the expiry of the initial period of 90 days and before the lodging of the charge-sheet on 21st February 2019
Will the Sudha Bharadwaj Bail Order Affect the Bhima Koregaon Case as a Whole? https://www.thequint.com/news/law/impact-of-sudha-bharadwaj-bail-order-bhima-koregaon-case Vakasha Sachdev Published: 04 Dec 2021, 9:56 AM IST
The Bombay HC's order may not affect the merits of the case, but the issues raised could have major consequences. On argument was .. It was not just the extension issue that had been heard and decided by a court which didn't have jurisdiction – the charge sheets against them all had also been filed before judges who didn't have the jurisdiction to deal with the matter... These same judges had then taken cognizance of the matter (on 15 November 2018 for Accused 1-5, and on 21 February 2019 for Bharadwaj and Accused 6-8), and allowed the case to proceed. .. It was therefore argued by the accused that because the charge sheets were filed before the wrong judge, and this wrong judge then took cognizance of them, everything that followed in the case stands vitiated (and hence they were entitled to default bail).
Supreme Court Dismisses NIA's Plea Challenging Default Bail To Sudha Bharadwaj In Bhima Koregaon Case Srishti Ojha 2021-12-07 https://www.livelaw.in/amp/top-stories/supreme-court-sudha-bharadwaj-default-bail-bhima-koregaon-nia-bombay-high-court-187093
Justice Lalit pointed out the proviso to Section 167(2) uses the word "Court" instead of "Magistrate" when it talks about the extension of the period of remand beyond 90 days. "The context of the matter is that it is only the Special Court which can take cognizance of the matter because it is the Special Court which is aware of the intricacies of the matter. These are the factors which weighed with Justice Nariman (in Bikramjit decision)", Justice Lalit observed while asking the ASG if there are any factors to take a view different from Bikramjit case. "If there's a special court that'd be the only court which can hear this", Justice Bhat added.
While granting bail to Bhardwaj, the High Court refused default bail to the other 8 accused in the case, after observing that they had not applied for default bail when that right had accrued to them. The High Court noted that none of them had filed an application seeking default bail at the time of expiry of 90 days of their detention.
Their case was premised on the argument that the cognizance of the chargesheet itself is vitiated, as the Court had no competence, and hence it should be presumed that no chargesheet has been filed as regards them. This was not accepted by the High Court based on the principle that mere irregularity in taking cognizance will not vitiate the proceedings.
Special NIA Court Paves Way For Sudha Bharadwaj's Release in Bhima Koregaon Case, Sets Bail Conditions Sharmeen Hakim 8 Dec 2021
Bharadwaj has been directed to reside in Mumbai, within the Special Court's jurisdiction, and disallowed from making any public statements. The court rejected her plea to travel between Chattisgarh, Mumbai and Delhi. Advocate Yug Chaudhry for Bharadwaj said she was a practising advocate and needed to earn her livelihood.
Comment: What about the rights of her clients to representation by a lawyer of their choice?
Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail To Sudha Bharadwaj In Bhima Koregaon Case; Refuses Bail To 8 Other Accused by Sharmeen Hakim 2021-12-01 https://www.livelaw.in/amp/top-stories/bombay-high-court-grants-default-bail-to-sudha-bharadwaj-in-bhima-koregaon-case-refuses-bail-to-8-other-accused-186679
The High Court accepted the petitioners' argument that the Additional Sessions Court, Pune, which took cognizance of the chargesheet filed by the NIA and also extended the period of detention of accused beyond 90 days as per Section 43D(2) of the UAPA, was not competent to do so. Because, the Pune Sessions Court was not notified as a Special Court under the NIA Act. Also, there was another Special NIA Court in existence in Pune at the relevant time. ..However, the High Court added that this irregularity will not result in vitiation of the cognizance taken on the chargesheet.,,
As far as the other 8 applicants are concerned, the High Court noted that none of them had filed an application seeking default bail at the time of expiry of 90 days of their detention.
Their case was premised on the argument that the cognizance of the chargesheet itself is vitiated, as the Court had no competence, and hence it should be presumed that no chargesheet has been filed as regards them. This was not accepted by the High Court on the basis of the principle that mere irregularity in taking cognizance will not vitiate the proceedings.
Full Judgement https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/sudha-bharadwaj-v-nia-405097.pdf
An open letter from Sahba Husain
Gautam Navlakha, nearly 70, is one of the oldest of the Bhima Koregaon arrestees, who was shifted to the “Anda Circle” (high security) from the barracks on October 12, 2021. Additionally, his telephone calls to me and his lawyers, his lifeline to the outside world, have been discontinued on the pretext that physical mulaquats have resumed in jail.
I, his partner, Sahba Husain, am over 70, and I live in Delhi. Travelling to Taloja Jail in Navi Mumbai frequently to meet him for the alloted ten minutes is difficult and Gautam’s only contact with me is through the two calls he was allowed every week to me that enabled me to send him articles of need, including medicines, books etc. With discontinuance of phone calls, all this will now depend on letters that take a minimum of two weeks to reach me.
Apart from the calls to me, regular access to lawyers through phone calls is an essential facility for undertrial prisoners. To deprive any undertrial prisoner of this effective and efficient mode of securing legal advice and help, or access to family, is the height of unfairness.
Gautam’s fragile health and well being will be further jeopardised by this withdrawal of the phone call facility to his family and lawyers. Already, in the Anda Circle, he is deprived of daily walks in the jail’s non-concreted greener areas and fresh air, and his health has deteriorated further, making specialised medical care an absolute necessity, if he is to live to fight this unjust and false case foisted on him. Without the weekly calls to me in Delhi, and to his lawyers, his life and his defence will be severely compromised.
Gautam writes, “confinement in Anda Circle means denial of fresh air/oxygen as there is not a single tree or plant in the open space of the Circle. And we are forbidden to step outside of the Anda Circle.... In other words, we spend 16 hours out of 24 cooped inside our cell and the 8 hours we are let out we are confined to a corridor 71/2’ x 72’ for our daily walk on cemented floor surrounded by high walls all around.”
Not long ago, Stan Swamy passed away in tragic circumstances. Stan, severely debilitated by Parkinson’s Disease, had to fight for such basic needs as a straw to drink, help to move to the toilet, and medical attention. His simple desire was that in his declining state of health he should be allowed to die at home in Ranchi. Even as his prayer before the court was pending, Stan Swamy passed away in a Mumbai hospital, indeed after once telling the court that he would rather be simply left to die in jail than be taken to the hospital.
These are prisoners of conscience, who have had to face indignities and humiliation for the smallest needs, and wage court battles for basic dignities in prison. In the past, when Navlakha’s original pair of spectacles went missing, it was difficult for the replacement spectacles to reach him in time.
It is not too much to ask for these simple facilities, phone access to his lawyers and family, and some fresh air to walk in once or twice a day.
Gautam has faced his unjustified incarceration with courage and spirit. How much longer is he going to be persecuted for his views, and to what extent will the authorities go to break his spirit?
Sahba Husain
BK16 and the Incarceration of Justice, a documentary film by Karwan e Mohabbat, India http://emeets.lnwr.in/index.php/where-have-all-the-flowers-gone/1318-kamla-bhasin Directed by Anam Sheikh Commissioned for Requiem for Justice
Pegasus Findings: Former Top Cops Call For Relook at Case Against Elgar Parishad 16 https://thewire.in/rights/pegasus-bhima-koregaon-police-officers
Three senior retired top police officers on August 5 condemned the findings of the Pegasus Project on the possible and confirmed surveillance of several journalists, social activists, politicians and others.
They also said that the exposé has revealed that the grounds on which the 16 academics, lawyers and activists were arrested in the Elgar Parishad case could be false.
Specifically on the Elgar Parishad case, he said, “Two events occurred that cast a shadow of doubt on the police version in the case. First, the Arsenal Consulting report, and secondly, the Pegasus reveals. Whether or not the Pegasus software was used to plant fake evidence in the accused devices should be thoroughly investigated.”
Bhima Koregaon Violence Caused By Another Group : Jaising Argues Relying On Ex-CM's Statements, Pune Police Affidavit Sharmeen Hakim 26 July 2021
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/bhima-koregaon-violence-caused-by-another-group-jaising-argues-relying-on-ex-cms-statements-pune-police-affidavit-178184
‘REVELATIONS ON SNOOPING VINDICATE OUR STAND’ http://www.kashmirtimes.com/newsdet.aspx?q=111761 Kashmir Times. Dated: 7/21/2021
mobile numbers of several Elgaar Parishad accused were on a list of those selected for surveillance by an unidentified client of NSO. Such “tampering”, the relatives of the Elgaar accused say, strengthens the suspicion that the “evidence” against the detainees was planted on their electronic devices — as already suggested by American digital forensics firm Arsenal Consulting in the case of two accused.
Among the surveillance targets named by the exposé are academics Hany Babu MT, Vernon Gonsalves, Anand Teltumbde and Shoma Sen; activists Gautam Navlakha and Rona Wilson; and lawyers Arun Ferreira and Sudha Bharadwaj.
The numbers of several relatives and suspected associates of the Elgaar detainees too were on the list. They include: “Varavara Rao’s daughter Pavana; lawyer Surendra Gadling’s wife Minal Gadling, his associate lawyers Nihalsingh Rathod and Jagadish Meshram, one of his former clients Maruti Kurwatkar, who was charged in multiple cases under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), incarcerated for over four years and later released on bail; Bharadwaj’s lawyer Shalini Gera; Teltumbde’s friend Jaison Cooper, a Kerala-based rights activist; scholar of the Naxalite movement and Bastar-based lawyer Bela Bhatia; one of the oldest members of the Kabir Kala Manch cultural group Rupali Jadhav; and tribal rights activist Mahesh Raut’s close associate and lawyer Lalsu Nagoti,” a report in The Wire news website, which participated in the exposé, said.
Opinion: India’s cruelty to its critics shows the deterioration of the world’s largest democracy https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/07/18/worlds-largest-democracy-takes-political-prisoners/
Indian authorities have jailed Surendra Gadling, a lawyer known for defending Dalits (once known as “untouchables”), and Rona Wilson, a human rights activist, for three years without trial. They are victims of an extensive malware campaign that framed them for plotting with Maoist insurgents, according to a recent forensics report. Someone — the perpetrator remains unknown — hacked into their computers via a malware-laden email, then planted incriminating documents, including one that discusses assassinating Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
What links Mr. Gadling, Mr. Wilson and many of the malware’s 14 other recipients is their outspoken criticism of India’s ruling party and Mr. Modi’s increasingly authoritarian tendencies.
They were accused of plotting to overthrow the Modi government. The evidence was planted, a new report says. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-bhima-koregaon-activists-jailed/2021/02/10/8087f172-61e0-11eb-a177-7765f29a9524_story.html A report from Arsenal Consulting, a Massachusetts-based digital forensics firm says that evidence against a group of Indian activists accused of plotting to overthrow the government was planted on a laptop seized by police.
An attacker used malware to infiltrate a laptop belonging to one of the activists, Rona Wilson, before his arrest and deposited at least 10 incriminating letters on the computer. Arsenal’s report on the Indian case does not identify the perpetrator of the cyberattack. The analysis, which has not been previously reported, was reviewed by The Washington Post. Three outside experts who reviewed the document at The Post’s request said the report’s conclusions were valid. Jaya Roy, a spokeswoman for the National Investigation Agency, the anti-terrorism authority overseeing the cases against the activists, said that the forensic analysis of Wilson’s laptop conducted by law enforcement did not show any evidence of malware on the device. She added that there was “substantial documentary and oral evidence” against the individuals charged in the case.
Akash Banerjee on the arsenal report: https://youtube.com/embed/mhmSiQgUxSc?start=701&end=951 (~4 mins)
Aresenal Report Filed before the the Special Judge NIA https://images.assettype.com/barandbench/2021-02/0142e0e9-962b-4f60-92cc-785a8a18fe81/NIA_v__Sudhir_Pralhad_Dhawale___Arsenal_report.pdf
Feb 8 , 2021
Prison-rights activist Rona Wilson’s hard disk contained malware that allowed remote access https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/bhima-koregaon-case-rona-wilson-hard-disk-malware-remote-access . The Caravan conducted a cyber-forensic examination of the contents of Wilson’s hard disk, a copy of the disk that was presented in court by the Pune Police and supplied to all the accused. Our investigation revealed that the disk contained malware that can be used to remotely access the computer and plant files. We also found several other discrepancies, pointing towards manipulation of evidence in the case.
Guess who is behind the propaganda of ‘forensic report’ giving a clean chit to Urban Naxal Rona Wilson: George Soros and Canada govt https://www.opindia.com/2021/02/rona-wilson-forensic-report-propaganda-george-soros-canada-govt/ After supporting an insurrection in India and Khalistanis who have been creating chaos and anarchy in India, the same organisation now seem to have come together to extend support to Urban Naxals who are accused of waging a war against India and plotting to assassinate Prime Minister Modi.
Bhima Koregaon Case: Govt Can Find Out Who Planted Documents, Says Cyber Expert https://www.thequint.com/amp/story/news/india/father-stan-swamy-bhima-koregaon-case-cyber-attack-expert-sandeep-shukla
Sandeep Sukla: The attacker is someone who had a lot of ground intelligence and information about the people who were targeted like whom they were interacting with, what kind of computers Wilson and Gadling had in their possession. Secondly, please note that the emails through which malware was delivered on computers was through the email IDs of the people known to Wilson and Gadling. And the subject of the email ID was such that was related to their ongoing discussion or program, which made them click on it. This kind of sophisticated malware requires not just a lot of time but also a lot of money because this skill is not cheap to hire.
The Arsenal report suggests that the one/s who hacked Gadling's computer may have hacked Swamy's computer as well.
Prior to this report, Arsenal Consulting had filed two more forensic reports in the NIA Special Court that revealed that cyber attackers had planted evidence in Rona Jacob Wilson's computer, another accused in the Bhima Koregaon case. Her computer was compromised for 22 months.
The Arsenal report has concluded that the same attacker/s who planted documents/PDF files in Wilson's computer had also compromised Gadling's computer for 20 months.
The Bizarre Evidence That Put Stan Swamy & The BK 16 In Prison https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuPKsG339nA
Fr. Stan Swamy passed away after eight months in prison - conditions that exacerbated his Parkinson's. He was one of the jailed human-rights advocates also known as the Bhima Koregaon 16.
The evidence that surrounds the case is bizarre.
The Wire breaks down the story, looking into the investigation conducted by Arsenal Consulting, a Boston-based digital forensics firm that has claimed the evidence for the arrests of the activists, was planted on their computers.
- Planted Evidence
- Bhima Koregaon: Marking three years since the first arrest
- Stan Swamy in a interview before formal arrest..
- Is Stan Swamy a Terrorist?
- Faith in the Court..
- Hany Babu & his work
- Jenny Rowena speaks at the solidarity meet for Hany Babu
- UAPA - Stan Sawmy
- Kabir Kala Manch
- political prisoners
- All the information you may want to know about BK16
- On the sixteen arrested in the Bhima Koregaon case
- Release the Bhima Koregaon 16 and Compensate Them
- Stan Swamy
- Work of Sudha Bharadwaj
- Mihir Desai: Bhima Koregaon Case
- Bhima Koregaon
- And the future of Stan Swamy
- Stan Swamy's mission
- Opp. leaders barring notable exceptions demand accountabilty for Stan
- Stan as Trainer & Undertrial..
- MKSS Statement on Fr. Stan’s death
- He Died Condemned, without a Trial
- Stan from Virugallur
- Articles on Stan's Passing..
- Messages at the Funeral Service of Fr. Stan Swamy
- 40 years of Struggle
- Dead in Custody