India’s agricultural yields are abysmal. The country farms far too much land area and produces far too little grain output, with way too many people dependent on this inefficient operation. It’s a trap of poverty that destroys the environment as collateral damageAnd if one takes BR Ambedkar’s social critique into consideration, it does all this while breeding a culture of casteism, in turn making the village a cesspool.

https://theprint.in/opinion/indian-agriculture-has-a-problem-we-farm-too-much-for-too-little/1804976/ 

Agriculture, over and above being a significant source of spending in the Union budget, is a state subject as well. State governments, put together, likely spend more than the Union. Which makes one ask: with an estimated Rs 7 Lakh Crore spending in one year between the states and Union, what are we getting? Why are the yields so poor that we don’t even match the global average?

 The answer, when one looks at the line items of spending, becomes clear: there is hardly any spending on agriculture itself, which would ideally mean spending on research and other ways of improving future yields. Instead, it’s largely spending on farmers to keep them where they are. An example of that is the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-Kisan), which is essentially a version of basic income, except it’s targeted at farmers. The question that ordinary people who aren’t farmers are entitled to ask at this point is: why not make this generic instead of targeting farmers? Maybe the return on that investment will be higher?
by 

E-library