Electoral Bonds Biggest Scam In History Of India, Voter Must Know Who Is Funding Parties : https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/electoral-bonds-biggest-scam-in-history-of-india-only-purpose-is-to-enrich-bjp-sr-adv-kapil-sibal-242488 Kapil Sibal Sheryl Sebastian 18 Nov 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVp-m2OOxmA

Besides Sunita Narain, Director General, Centre for Science and Environment, Ambani is the only Indian who has been appointed on the Advisory Committee to the President of COP28. https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/corporate/story/reliance-chairman-mukesh-ambani-joins-advisory-committee-of-global-climate-change-panel-cop28-383005-2023-05-26
The COP28 UAE Advisory Committee brings together climate experts from six continents. The 31 members of the Committee, who represent policy, industry, energy, finance, civil society, youth, and humanitarian and 65 percent of whom are from the Global South, will provide guidance and counsel to the COP Presidency in the run-up to COP28 and beyond

https://planet.outlookindia.com/news/mukesh-ambani-joins-cop28-president-s-advisory-committee-news-415356 The 31 members of the Committee, 65 per cent of whom are from the Global South and represent policy, industry, energy, finance, civil society, youth, and humanitarian issues, will provide guidance and counsel to the COP Presidency in the run-up to COP28 and beyond.

https://themorningcontext.com/business/why-cop28-matters-to-mukesh-ambanis-new-energy-ambitions Mukesh Ambani's plans to turn Reliance Industries into a green energy powerhouse could get a boost if climate negotiators manage to agree on certain aspects of the energy transition. It helps that Ambani himself has found a spot on the panel. 

Right to Information (RTI) & Privacy: Congruent or Contradictory? Panel Discussion  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmOZLvR_mkI IMPRI Impact and Policy Research In

[Apar Gupta Puts the whole debate in the real context of the "state" growing frighteningly more and more authoritarian and the "individual" getting weaker and weaker.]

What has to be, in this context, kept in mind is that both "privacy" and "transparency" have two sides.
One, the right -- whether "transparency" or "privacy" -- of the "individual" vis-a-vis the "state" and vice versa.

Puttuswamy had filed his case in the context of the Aadhaar. Aadhar, it was apprehended, would make the "individual" unduly "transparent" to the "state".
This "individual" vis-a-vis the "state" aspect must be on top of our collective mind.
We've, as a rule, to strengthen the "individual" vis-a-vis the "state" -- whether in terms of the "right to know" or "the right to privacy".

That has got to be the bottom line.
Even then, if a conflict arises between the interests of a privileged individual and a commoner, then it's the latter we must bat for.