Congress MP Dhiraj Sahoo के घर cash मिलने का Sanjay Jha ने बताया पूरा सच! Dhiraj Sahoo cash video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9dtmB3zNWM
237K views 5 days ago #dhirajsahu #publicmeter #rahulgandhi
BJP leaders are trolling Rahul Gandhi because more than Rs 250 crore in cash was recovered from the house of Congress MP Dheeraj Sahu. Praveen Gautam's analysis on how political analyst Sanjay Jha showed the bigger picture of politics when so much black money was found in the house of a Congress MP.
https://thewire.in/law/the-last-pillar-of-indian-democracy-has-fallen
the Supreme Court has opened the way for his or any future government to amend the Constitution without having to bother with getting a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.
To justify its decision, the bench has put forward two other supporting arguments. The first is that Article 370 was placed in part 21 of the Constitution titled “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions”. Thus it was never meant to be permanent. So all that the Modi government has done is to close the chapter on Kashmir.
The second is that over the decades since the accession, Kashmir’s laws have in any case been brought in line progressively with those of the rest of India. So as the government has argued, the autonomy shielded by Article 370 had been been ‘gradually eroded’.
What the Supreme Court has chosen to ignore is that all this was done with the consent of the Kashmir governments of the time. Sheikh Abdullah had signed the Delhi agreement only after convening a constituent Assembly with 75 members, to approve of it. In the decades that followed, more and more all-India laws and provisions were extended to Kashmir as well with the full consent, often at the request of, the Kashmir government. As Sheikh Abdullah’s talks with Indira Gandhi’s special representative, G. Parthasarathy, before returning to power showed, there was next to nothing left that he wanted to change.
This process was a world away from the sleight of hand that the Modi government used in 2019, to ‘complete’ the integration. The contrast between ‘erosion by consent’ and ‘erosion through brute force’ was vividly demonstrated by the weeks-long curfews, the complete shut down of internet services, and the paralysis of transport even afterwards that forced people catching flights out of Kashmir to walk kilometres to get to the airport. For the Supreme Court to have glossed over this stark and humiliating difference is inexcusable.
Judiciary Slams EC I "Abdication of Constitutional Duties " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKaYxcJyCrc Mojo Story At a time when the powers of the election commission, its independence and how to appoint its members is the subject of fierce debate, the Election Commission finds itself in the middle of a big legal controversy. The Bombay High Court has directed the Election Commission of India to immediately conduct bypoll to the Pune Lok Sabha seat which has been vacant since March 29, 2023, after the death of Member of Parliament Girish Bapat.
A division bench of Justices GS Patel and Kamal Khata quashed and set aside a certificate issued by the ECI which stated that bypoll will not be held.
Citizens going unrepresented would amount to sabotaging the entire constitutional framework, the Bombay High Court said. “We find it unthinkable that several months could go pass and the entire constituency be told that now time has not remained and constituency might as well wait for 2024. We cannot possibly accept or contemplate this,” the bench held.
ECI submitted that the whole of its machinery has been far too busy since March 2023 to prepare for the upcoming general elections of 2024. The court did not find this to be a genuine difficulty.
The petitioner, Sughosh Joshi, a registered voter in Pune constituency, challenged the ECI certificate.
Advocate Dayaar Singla | Petitioner's Lawyer
Abha Singh | Lawyer
Satya Pal Jain | Additional Solicitor General of India
Ashutosh Shrivastava | Advocate