SWaCH Pune Seva Sahakari Sanstha (SWaCH) is a fully member-owned waste pickers’ cooperative  https://prizeforcities.org/project/swach-pune-seva-sahakari-sanstha  . In Pune, door-to-door services covered only 7% of households. SWaCH signed its first agreement with the Pune Municipal Corporation in 2008: its members would extend door-to-door solid waste collection to at least 50% of Pune, and the city would fund administrative staff time, equipment and health benefits. In the SWaCH model, pairs of members collect segregated waste from 150‐400 households each, transferring recyclables and wet waste to city-run collection vehicles. Members make money through user fees collected directly from household and commercial clients and by selling recyclables to scrap dealers.

A Brief History of Pune’s Waste pickers https://kashtakaripanchayat.org/a-comprehensive-history-of-waste-picking-in-pune/ 

Rosamma: Comments  There is a petition circulating about the imminent end of the current model of waste collection in Pune, seeking signatures to support the group managing the city waste. I wanted to explain why I will not be signing, please.  I worked briefly with Kagad Kach Patra Kashtakari Panchayat (KKPKP), the collective of waste pickers and recyclers, and my experience was not inspiring. The women in top leadership positions were all without exception Brahmin, and there appeared to be not much empathy for the workers -- if the workers missed paying membership fees, they were deprived of what benefits they would otherwise receive, like free notebooks for their school going children, or even solidarity from the group in times of domestic violence. 

When I worked there, one young woman accountant was hired -- she was given a cycle, and expected to ride a few km to the residence of the woman who was authorized to sign cheques to get her signature. This young accountant, I found, would cycle even during her monthly period, since no reimbursement of auto fares was offered. 

 Poornima, the retired academic who was the spirit behind the group, was genuinely generous and often offered donations to tide over difficult times, but appeared to be sidelined when it came to decision-making. 

The group was quite successful in getting good press, and I suspect I was hired with the intention of getting some leverage with the press. I could not be writing as a journalist while working with them, and I realize I was then not much use.  The workers lived in deplorable shanties, some of them in low-lying areas prone to floods; there was one well-designed small house that had been constructed by the group that would feature in news reports. 

What these workers ideally need is regular jobs with decent salaries. This is important work, and it needs to be done regularly, so they ought to be hired as regular government staff. KKPKP would stop short of making that demand, arguing that it would never be granted. In truth, government jobs for these workers would make the highest-paid of KKPKP redundant. 

content creator deletes video promoting religious harmony, apologises   https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/maharashtra-after-backlash-from-brahmin-group-content-creator-deleted-video-promoting-religious-harmony-apologises-10211280/  In the now-deleted reel, Sudame buys an idol from a Muslim vendor, saying.. “While making the Ganpati you had good intentions in your heart, right? My father says we should be like sugar that sweetens both shev kheer as well as sheer khurma, like a brick that makes both a mandir and a masjid, like a flower that is used in a garland as well as a chaddar (holy sheet) as well.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x85Cqo-roYc Atharva Sudame Controversy Video: अथर्व सुदामेच्या 'या' व्हिडीओमुळे त्याने माफी मागितली...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuPyBJl7v1c  https://youtu.be/XuPyBJl7v1c?t=194 the argument is that each religion should be in their own silos. "There is no need" for showing and encouraging inter-faith synergy. 

https://youtu.be/XuPyBJl7v1c?t=194  their argument is that each religion should be in their own silos. "There is no need" for showing and encouraging inter-faith synergy.  He says  That Sarva Dharma Sambhav means that each religion is given its own space, and that there is no need for followers on one religion should get involved in the practices, and processes of the other..   It is this logic that we can address. How each of us will loose out if we dont allow in good things from all directions..

 आनो भद्राः क्रतवो यन्तु विश्वत: | ऋग्वेद – 1.89.

Election of candidates can be set aside if they make false declaration on educational qualifications: SC https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india-election-of-candidates-can-be-set-aside-if-they-make-false-declaration-on-educational-qualifications-sc-354849 
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that election of a candidate could be set aside if he/she is found to have made false declaration on educational qualifications in the nomination paper. The Supreme Court bench further said that the right to vote would be meaningless unless citizens were well-informed about the antecedents of candidates, including their educational qualifications. 

Upto now.. what was the posotion 

 https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/lawreports/electoraldisqualifications/30.php?Title=Electoral%20Disqualifications 

Report No. 244 : 

(iii) Current legal consequences on false disclosure

 if a complaint is submitted regarding furnishing of false information, supported by documentary evidence, the Returning Officer should initiate action to prosecute the candidate under Section 125A of the RPA which provides penalty for filing false affidavits.90 A candidate who fails to furnish the required information, gives false information or conceals any information, may be punished with imprisonment for a term up to six months or with fine or with both.

Election Commission's letter No. 3/ER/2004-JS-II, dated 02.06.2004. says .. Section 125A of the RPA has not been included in the list of offences under Section 8 of the RPA. This means that a conviction under Section 125A does not lead to disqualification of the candidate for the duration of imprisonment and a further period of 6 years.