000-tobecategorised

 The Rise and Fall of Indian TV News: From DD Calm to Arnab's Chaoshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9Ad6hDQ6-o   newslaundry
Manisha is traveling for elections, so we’re back with another gem of an episode from the past! In this special episode of TV Newsance, we take a deep dive into the evolution of Indian primetime news – from the tightly controlled, monotonous days of Doordarshan (DD) to today’s chaotic shouting matches.

We explore key milestones in this journey, starting with the birth of DD News in 1959, the disruption caused by Newstrack in 1989, and the explosion of private channels after the 1992 cable TV boom. From investigative reporting to sensationalism, we'll cover the rise of ad-driven TRP races, absurd news stories, and how the debate format evolved into the loud confrontations we see today.
With figures like Arnab Goswami leading the charge, primetime news has transformed into a battleground of shouting matches – but at what cost?

https://www.moneylife.in/article/dont-stop-citizens-from-recording-video-inside-police-stations-nagpur-police/71149.html  Don’t Stop Citizens from Recording Video inside Police Stations: Nagpur Police
Moneylife Digital Team 20 June 2023 

In an order issued last week, Dr Ashwini Patil, deputy commissioner of police (headquarter), says, "It is observed that the duty officers are unnecessarily arguing with citizens who are doing video recording inside police stations and registering a complaint against them. A police station is a public place, and you are directed not to prohibit citizens from video recording inside the police station."
 
“The HC had clarified that 'prohibited place' as defined in section 2(8) of the official secrets act, does not cover police station and hence no case can be registered against a citizen for recording inside the police station,” Dr Patil stated.

Each Forward Of Objectionable ‘Whatsapp Message’ Cannot Be Interpreted To Create Unrest To Attract Offence U/S 153A IPC: Bombay HC https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/bombay-high-court-dnyaneshwar-rohidas-wakale-v-the-state-of-maharashtra-2024bhc-aug22690-db-forwarded-message-social-media-sections-295-a-153-a-ipc-and-section-3v-sc-st-act-1989-1552865  ByTanveer Kaur|27 Sept 2024  The bench of Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice SG Chapalgaonkar observed, “People are required to exercise self restraint in such situation and not to forward whatever is received on such App or social media platforms. Anyway, each forward of such message cannot be interpreted to create unrest in the society or two groups of people or two races.”

https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/bombay-high-court-dnyaneshwar-rohidas-wakale-v-the-state-of-maharashtra-2024bhc-aug22690-db-forwarded-message-social-media-sections-295-a-153-a-ipc-and-section-3v-sc-st-act-1989-1552865 

 https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/bombay-high-court-dnyaneshwar-rohidas-wakale-v-the-state-of-maharashtra-2024bhc-aug22690-db-forwarded-message-social-media-sections-295-a-153-a-ipc-and-section-3v-sc-st-act-1989-1552865

https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/bombay-high-court-dnyaneshwar-rohidas-wakale-v-the-state-of-maharashtra-2024bhc-aug22690-db-forwarded-message-social-media-sections-295-a-153-a-ipc-and-section-3v-sc-st-act-1989-1552865