SC का बड़ा धमाका, तीस्ता सीतलवाड़ की बड़ी जीत,Supreme Court grants bail to activist Teesta Setalvad https://youtu.be/4sG3-qdSx2A?t=97 DESH NEETI
SC ने अपने आदेश में कहा - Teesta Setalvad गवाहों को प्रभावित करने की कोशिश ना करें | Kanoon Ki Baat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3k2ka0iEe8 NDTV India सुप्रीम कोर्ट (Supreme Court) में तीस्ता सीतलवाड़ (Teesta Setalvad) की जमानत याचिका पर सुनवाई की. तीस्ता सीतलवाड़ (Teesta Setalvad) को बड़ी राहत मिल गई. उन्हें सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने जमानत दे दी. गुजरात हाईकोर्ट का फैसला रद्द कर दिया गया. हाईकोर्ट ने एक जुलाई को जमानत याचिका खारिज कर तुरंत सरेंडर करने को कहा था.
Twitter @LiveLawIndia #SupremeCourt grants regular bail to human rights activist #TeestaSetalvad in the Gujarat police case over alleged fabrication of evidence in 2002 riots cases. Supreme Court says observations in the Gujarat HC order denying her bail are "perverse" & "contradictory".
Teesta Setalvad Case | 'What Investigation Done In 24 Hours? What Was State Doing For 20 Yrs?' : Questions By Supreme Court To Gujarat Police Awstika https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-high-court-order-perverse-contradictory-five-questions-teesta-setalvad-bail-233123 “On one hand, the learned judge has spent pages to observe how it was unnecessary – rather not permissible – at the stage of granting bail, to consider whether a prima facie case has been made out. On the other hand, the judge observes that a prima facie case under Section 194 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. The findings are totally contradictory, to say the least.” ...“Our limited understanding of law [tells us] that the factors that should be considered at the stage of the grant of bail are prima facie case, the possibility of the accused tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, and fleeing away from the ends of justice. Other considerations include the gravity and seriousness of the offence. If the observations of the judge are to be accepted, then no bail application at the pre-trial stage could be entertained unless the accused has filed an application for quashing the proceedings under Section 482 CrPC or moved the high court or the Supreme Court under Articles 226 and 32. To say the least, the findings are totally perverse.”...
The bench also seemed critical of the adverse observations made by the Supreme Court in the Zakia Jafri case against Teesta, which formed the foundation for the Gujarat police FIR. Principle of natural justice is a fundamental tenet of rule of law, said Justice Gavai, after noting that Teesta Setalvad was not heard in the Zakia Jafri case, after the State of Gujarat objected to her locus standi.