Human Rights Defenders Data Information Knowledge Solidarity
HRDs must counter State's offensive of intimidating ordinary people, from expressing their opinion on social media or on various issues . Lawyers as well as Journalists, and youtubers bring these cases up in the public eye in order to youth to feel more secure speaking out.. This series we will document case law as well as reports through links to documents, reports from various websites and Blogs and Posts of HRDs. This is also an attempt to publicise all the dirty tricks State have been using. This is a contributory effort..
THE DANGEROUS IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT DENYING BAIL TO UMAR KHALID AND SHARJEEL IMAM https://pucl.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/18Jan2025-PUCL-Position-Paper-SCUmarSHarjeel.pdf 18th Jan 20026
the judgment indicates that the Supreme Court has given the supreme imprimatur to the criminalisation of the constitutional freedoms of
speech, association and assembly, especially when exercised by Muslim citizens of India. It also lays down a troubling interpretation of the UAPA with serious implications for the future of the constitutional freedoms of speech, association and assembly.
PUCL states that the Supreme Court judgment, which has ignored set precedent and broadened the scope of terrorism under UAPA to include acts of civil disobedience and democratic protest by citizens, requires judicial review and scrutiny. UAPA has been systematically used against political dissenters and protesting citizens since its enactment. The amendments over the last decade have made the provisions even more draconian, leading to denial of bail in most cases, even where no or questionable evidence exists
Please see the full video of PUCL Dialogues on the issue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4uASZySICY&pp=0gcJCU8KAYcqIYzv
A group of US lawmakers have expressed their concern over the prolonged pre-trial detention of student activist and scholar Umar Khalid and have written to Vinay Mohan Kwatra , the Indian Ambassador in Washington, over the issue.
Urging that Khalid be granted bail, in their letter, the Members of the US Congress and the US Senate said that Khalid’s confinement in jail for almost five years “raises serious questions about due process, human rights and India’s obligations under international law”, reported The Tribune.
02/01/2026
Allegations Not Prima Facie Correct, Long Pre-Trial Custody' : Supreme Court Grants Bail To UAPA Accused In Case Over PFI-Links https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/allegations-not-prima-facie-correct-long-pre-trial-custody-supreme-court-grants-bail-to-uapa-accused-in-case-over-pfi-links-278672 Yash Mittal 18 Dec 2024
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/courts-should-not-hesitate-to-grant-bail-under-uapa-in-deserving-cases-supreme-court/article68522270.ece https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bail-rule-jail-exception-even-in-special-law-like-uapa-supreme-court/articleshow/112504869.cms In an important ruling, Supreme Court Tuesday held that the conventional idea ‘bail is the rule, jail is an exception’ should be applicable not only to IPC offences but also to others for which special statutes like Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act have been enacted if the conditions prescribed under that law are fulfilled.
While granting bail to a former constable of Bihar Police who was charged under the stringent UAPA because of his alleged association with the outlawed Islamist outfit Popular Front of India (PFI), a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih emphasised that courts should not hesitate in granting bail in serious offences if a case is made out for bail.
Supreme Court cancels bail granted to 8 ‘PFI members’ in UAPA case https://indianexpress.com/article/india/pfi-nia-uapa-case-supreme-court-9345006/ May 24, 2024 Booked by the National Investigation Agency, the eight alleged members of the banned Popular Front of India were granted bail by the Madras High Court on October 19, 2023.
- Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing Citing Paucity Of Time
- differential approach to bail for Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam undermines binding precedent
- Janaki Nair on the Umar Khalid case
- Such a fine distinction.. "need to be informed but not in writing"
- Huridocs documenting human rights formats
- 'Bulldozer Justice Continues Despite SC Verdict'
- Supreme Court Pauses 'Bulldozer Actions'
- Bull Dozer in Nala Sopara
- Bulldozer Justice is an Injustice
- The alarming scope of Maharashtra’s Special Public Safety Bill, 2024
Subcategories
BAIL
For UAPA articles under
Free Speech
Ban on films, documentaries by Government e.g documentary on PM by BBC. Debate on censorship, opinion, statements by media people, leaders, screening of film on Modi at universities etc.
Corporate Behaviour and Free Speech
In a defamation case against Paranjoy Thakurta, a court has order, issued on September 6, directed the removal of defamatory content from their respective articles and social media posts within five days. In the suit filed by Adani Enterprises Ltd, seen by HT, the allegedly defamatory material includes transcripts of YouTube videos, screenshots of X posts by journalists, and images of their X profiles.https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/mib-issues-takedown-notices-to-13-digital-news-publishers-over-adani-defamation-case/ar-AA1MIjBR
Based on this, The ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) on Tuesday issued takedown notices to 13 digital news publishers on YouTube and Instagram for disseminating defamatory content related to Adani Enterprises Ltd.The ministry’s order names journalists, media houses, and creators — including Newslaundry, Ravish Kumar, Dhruv Rathee, The Wire, HW News Network, and Aakash Banerjee’s The Deshbhakt — who have received a list of 138 YouTube video URLs and 83 Instagram links to be taken down.

